The chaos-inducing “aboboyaa” have become a scourge on Ghana’s urban landscapes, endangering lives and undermining the very fabric of the country’s transportation infrastructure. These ubiquitous three-wheeled vehicles, often overloaded and driven recklessly, have become a symbol of the government’s failure to address the pressing need for comprehensive regulation in the face of a growing informal economy.

As the cacophony of horns and the reckless weaving of aboboyaa clog the streets of Accra and other major cities, the time for half-measures and political hesitation has long passed. The authorities must now take decisive action to tame this menace, ensuring that operators are properly licensed, adhere to traffic regulations, and prioritize the safety of all road users.

The economic importance of the aboboyaa cannot be ignored. These tricycles provide essential transport services, serving as cargo carriers, garbage collectors, and makeshift taxis for the country’s marginalized communities. They offer a vital lifeline for many young Ghanaians seeking financial independence. Nevertheless, this economic benefit cannot come at the cost of public safety and the smooth functioning of our urban centers.

As the number of aboboyaa has climbed sharply, the consequences have become increasingly dire. Reckless driving, disregard for traffic rules, and chronic congestion have become the norm, with the vehicles often lacking basic safety features and regularly overloaded. This has led to a surge in “unnecessary accidents,” as described by transportation expert Mr. Joseph K. Horgle, Chief Executive Officer of J.K. Horgle Transport & Co. Ltd., and a growing sense of frustration among the public.

The regulatory void surrounding the tricycles has only aggravated the problem. Past attempts to impose restrictions have faced fierce resistance from operators, underscoring the complex and multifaceted nature of this issue. Yet, the authorities can no longer afford to be paralyzed by this challenge; the time for action is now.

The solution lies in a comprehensive and strictly enforced regulatory framework that delicately balances the economic realities of the operators with the paramount need for public safety. This framework must go beyond piecemeal solutions and embrace a holistic and integrated approach, according to Mr. Horgle.

At the heart of this framework must be a mandatory registration and licensing system for all aboboyaa operators. This would establish a clear record of qualifications, making it easier to identify and penalize those who engage in reckless or illegal activities. Rigorous training and testing on traffic laws, safe driving practices, and vehicle maintenance would ensure that operators are equipped with the knowledge and skills to navigate the roads safely.

Together with this, the authorities must set and enforce minimum safety standards for the aboboyaa. Mandatory installation of adequate lighting systems, functional brakes, and durable tires, coupled with regular inspections, would help mitigate the inherent risks associated with these vehicles. Anyone that fails to meet these requirements should be swiftly removed from the roads until necessary repairs or upgrades are completed, said Mr. Horgle, who is also a road safety crusader.

To address the issue of unrestricted movement in congested urban areas, the expert recommends implementing a system of designated routes and zones for aboboyaa operations. This strategic zoning he said, can help manage traffic flow, reduce congestion, and separate these tricycles from faster-moving vehicles or vulnerable pedestrian traffic, thereby improving overall safety.

Mr. Horgle emphasized that effective enforcement is crucial to the success of any regulatory framework, stressing that traffic police must be empowered and equipped to enforce traffic laws and regulations, with a laser-like focus on speeding, reckless driving, overloading, and non-compliance with designated routes. Visible and proactive enforcement can serve as a powerful deterrent, sending a clear message that irresponsible behavior will not be tolerated.

Alongside strict enforcement, comprehensive public education campaigns are essential in promoting safety and fostering a culture of responsibility on Ghana’s roads. These campaigns should target both aboboyaa operators and the general public, raising awareness of the inherent risks and emphasizing the importance of adhering to traffic laws and regulations, including the use of helmets.

Recognizing the potential challenges faced by operators in meeting new regulatory requirements, the authorities must also provide robust alternative livelihood programmes. These programmes should offer a safety net, providing vocational training, access to small business loans, and assistance with finding alternative employment.

The development and implementation of this regulatory framework must involve meaningful and sustained engagement with all relevant stakeholders, including operators, community leaders, transport unions, and civil society organizations. This will help build consensus, promote a sense of ownership, and ensure that the regulations are practical and sustainable in the long run, according to Mr. Horgle.

The time for hesitation and political inaction has passed. Ghana’s urban centres can no longer afford to be held hostage by the chaos-inducing aboboyaa. The authorities must take decisive action, taming this menace through comprehensive regulation that prioritizes public safety while acknowledging the economic realities of the operators. Only then can Ghana’s cities truly thrive, offering safe and efficient transportation for all.

By Innocent Samuel Appiah

The post Tame the tricycle menace: A call for complete regulation of the ‘aboboyaa’ scourge appeared first on Ghana Business News.

I first met Dr. Leon Bass in the late 1990s while working for professional development organization Facing History and Ourselves.   

I listened to his riveting tale of growing up in Philadelphia as the son of a Pullman porter, enlisting in our country’s segregated army after graduating from high school, and fighting for freedoms he didn’t enjoy at home because of his race. His anger subsided somewhat when he witnessed the atrocities of the Buchenwald concentration camp, where he arrived shortly after its liberation.  After returning home, Bass completed his education before launching a more than 30-year career that culminated in his serving as principal at one of his hometown’s toughest high schools.   

His past and present collided one day when he observed students displaying indifference to the wrenching story told by Nina Kaleska, a survivor of the Auschwitz death camp.  Speaking publicly for the first time of his wartime experience, he told the students she was telling the truth.  You’ve got something to say, Kaleska told him. He heeded the survivor’s call and spoke in schools, prisons and religious institutions for more than 35 years.

In the closing of his speeches, Dr. Bass would often pose the question to the audience about the cost of doing right:  So you answer the question, “Is the price too high?” I don’t think so. But I can’t speak for you.  I can only speak for me. You must answer the question, “Is the price too high?”

His words have stayed with me in the close to 30 years since I first heard them, and have struck a particularly resonant chord in the month since Donald Trump took the oath of office and resumed his position as president of the United States. 

I attended Trump’s first inauguration on a rainy Friday in January 2017.  I went because I wanted to see for myself the transition from our nation’s first black president to what Trump was ushering into our nation. I left his “American carnage” address deeply unsettled about what would follow.  Here is what I wrote for the Daily Maverick, a South African publication: 

If there was any doubt before Donald Trump’s searing, angry inaugural address and initial actions as President of the United States, let that be permanently gone.

Everything is on the table:

America’s role as a leader engaged in transnational alliances;

A national commitment to fight climate change;

The right of Americans to healthcare that has been under assault from Republicans since the passage of the landmark Affordable Care Act in 2010;

Government agencies that have supported the arts and public for decades;

The belief that our country’s diversity is an asset to be appreciated and embraced;

And, according to some, the core and soul of our democratic nation.

Eight years later, all of these and more are on the line-but with a different and more dangerous set of circumstances. I want to be clear that I understand and am not saying that Trump is Adolf Hitler or that we are Germany in the early 1930s.  There are many profound differences between the two countries.  Weimar Germany was a fledgling democracy formed in the aftermath of World War I while we have nearly 250 years of entrenched democratic systems.  Hitler rose to power on a platform of what some have described as eliminationist antisemitism.  While anti-immigrant hatred was a core message of Trump’s successful election campaign, he was not advocating for the murder of an entire people.   More generally, I have written before about the all too easy tendency to label figures ranging from Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer to former President Barack Obama as a Nazi for the actions political opponents deem overly heavy handed or antidemocratic. 

At the same time, there are some significant disturbing parallels between the two countries.  Like all democracies, they are living entities with laws, practices and norms that require upholding to remain robust and that cannot sustain indefinite blows.  On a fundamental level, they depend on trust, faith and support of a majority of the governed.  Hitler became chancellor in January 1933, close to 10 years after the “Beer Hall putsch,” the failed coup that he and other Nazis recast as a heroic effort to save the nation.  His ascent came at a time, as historian and friend Steve Cohen noted, when more than half of the German public voted for parties on the far left and the far right that opposed democracy.   

Trump’s inauguration last month followed nearly a decade of assaulting our country’s most basic democratic fabric, the legitimacy of elections and the peaceful transfer of power.  Starting with his first run in 2016 against Hillary Clinton, he has repeatedly refused to acknowledge election results unless he won.  In 2020, he perpetuated against all evidence and dozens of unsuccessful lawsuits the Big Lie that he beat Joe Biden-a falsehood that has enduring support among about two thirds of Republicans.   

He continued the charade on his first day in office, pardoning close to 1,600 supporters who attempted their own coup on January 6, 2021 by storming the Capitol the day Biden’s victory was certified.  Trump had called this group, which included people convicted of violently assaulting police officers, hostages. As he has done throughout this phase of his public life, he has issued a relentless stream of attacks on the media, immigrants and the government that, like body blows on a fighter, have taken an inexorable toll.   In a chilling similarity to the weakening of democracy in Weimar Germany, Trump won the popular vote and all of the swing states. 

Already present during his first administration, these currents, like the antisemitism in the early days of Hitler’s reign, have been codified in rapid fashion.  Trump has issued a barrage of executive orders that have included blatantly unconstitutional measures like banning birthright citizenship, supported Elon Musk and DOGE’s mass firings or layoffs of government workers, and advanced blatantly imperialist aspirations. In many cases he has drawn on the personnel, specific planks and general approach toward government articulated in Project 2025-the tome coordinated by the Heritage Foundation that he disavowed during the campaign.

But in a critical difference from his first term, Trump has no meaningful restraints this time. Operating with a razor-thin majority, House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson appears to have conceded the constitutionally-enshrined power of the purse to the executive branch. The Democrats have continued to struggle to formulate a coherent message beyond being unnerved by their powerless status.  The Senate has confirmed all of Trump’s cabinet appointees thus far, including the spectacularly unqualified Pete Hegseth, Tulsi Gabbard and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.   Corporate media owners like Jeff Bezos and the bosses at ABC, apparently eager to curry favor with Trump, have engaged in a craven capitulation by killing editorials, spiking cartoons and settling a defamation lawsuit for $15 million.  For his part, Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg parroted Trump’s language about censorship and political bias in announcing the platform’s decision to eliminate fact checking. 

Federal courts have put a check on some of Trump’s actions, but the Supreme Court gave him an astounding level of immunity during last year’s Trump v. United States decision.  Aided by Musk, Trump seems to be advancing a strategy of making change on the ground, seeing how he fares in the courts, and, like the elections, defying them if he doesn’t get the result that he likes.  Vice President J.D. Vance has already advanced the idea that judges don’t get to control the executive branch’s power. 

Perhaps most troubling of all, though, for the future prospects of our democracy, is the reaction of the public.  Thus far they have been met with strong approval from supporters and a more subdued response from opponents than during the first Trump administration. 

On one level, the muted protest response is understandable.  The first Trump term engendered a stomach-churning, teeth-gnashing feeling, a sense of unpredictability that the bottom has not arrived and may never get here.  The second term has brought for many a sense of bewilderment at the speed of the measures, dismay at the lack of power at the federal level until the next election cycle and the knowledge that the Republicans control both houses of Congress and the presidency.  

The magnitude of the task ahead is daunting, but the stakes could not be higher.  I understand the desire to avoid reading the latest distressing development.  I get the weariness and the despair, and we must not give into it.  Rather we must gird ourselves to ask ourselves if the price is too high to stop the movement of our country not into the genocide of the Nazi era, but into what scholars Steven Levitsky and Lucan Way have called competitive authoritarianism-a hollowed out form of government  in which the coexistence of meaningful democratic institutions and serious incumbent abuse yields electoral competition that is real but unfair.   That unhappy destination is not inevitable, but will not be avoided without sustained and strategic action on a large scale by those of us who see the need for a different way. 

The Trump Administration marked one month on February 20.  I last saw Dr. Bass at his 90th birthday party in January, 2015, shortly before his death.  He stayed seated most of the time and his mind wasn’t as clear as it had been.  But he knew who he was and he understood the love enveloping him from the family and friends who were celebrating his remarkable life.  On the centenary of his birth, I am proceeding with deep concern about our country’s present and future and the fervent hope that I, like he, will find within myself the fortitude to do what I believe is right. 

By Jeff Kelly Lowenstein

The author is the founder and executive director of the Center for Collaborative Investigative Journalism (CCIJ) and an associate professor teaching journalism at Grand Valley State University. 

The post When I met Dr Leon Bass appeared first on Ghana Business News.

In the heart of Ghana’s burgeoning economic landscape, a unique opportunity exists to forge a powerful synergy between corporate innovation and public health.

As a respiratory therapist and fourth-year medical student who is deeply passionate about cardiothoracic surgery, I have observed a crucial gap: the absence of consistent medical perspectives within the strategic decision-making processes of our leading companies.

My journey has been one of bridging divides. Running a corporate health consultancy, I have witnessed firsthand the transformative power of empowering individuals with life-saving skills and health knowledge. This experience, coupled with my medical training, has instilled in me a profound understanding of how health directly impacts productivity, community well-being, and ultimately, a nation’s progress.

Inspired by models like McKinsey’s UK medical elective, which successfully integrates medical student insights into healthcare system improvements, I propose a bold initiative for Ghana: the integration of medical expertise into corporate project planning. Imagine the potential. Imagine the impact.

Consider this: every investment, every development, every strategic decision carries potential health implications. From the environmental impact of industrial projects to the occupational health of employees, the ripple effects are undeniable. By proactively incorporating medical insight, companies can not only mitigate risks but also unlock significant opportunities for positive social impact.

Medical students can offer a unique perspective, a fresh lens through which to examine investment banking and private equity projects. Medical students can provide health impact assessments, ensuring your initiatives align with public health principles. I can facilitate health education and awareness programs, empowering your workforce and contributing to a healthier community. I can serve as a bridge between your organization and the medical community, fostering collaboration and knowledge exchange.

This is not about adding another layer of bureaucracy; it’s about fostering a culture of holistic thinking. It’s about recognizing that a healthy workforce is a productive workforce, and a healthy community is a thriving community. It’s about understanding that corporate success and public health are not mutually exclusive; they are intrinsically linked.

In a nation where health challenges persist and where access to quality healthcare remains a concern, this initiative presents a powerful opportunity for corporate leadership. By embracing medical insight, your company can demonstrate a commitment to social responsibility, enhance your brand reputation, and ultimately, contribute to a healthier, more prosperous Ghana.

The McKinsey Medical Elective applicants must be available to spend a minimum of six weeks with the McKinsey, with an option to extend up to 12 weeks in total. The medical elective program is a fixed-term opportunity for you to meet us and learn more about healthcare management. McKinsey has made a bursary available to help cover the cost of the elective. I believe Deloitte, Ernst & Young, PwC, private equity, and investment banking firms in Ghana would benefit from replicating this model.

In summary, Ghana stands at a crucial juncture. The nation’s economic vitality and the health of its citizens are inextricably linked. By embracing the integration of medical expertise into corporate strategy, as demonstrated by successful models like McKinsey’s UK medical elective, Ghanaian businesses have a unique opportunity to not only mitigate potential health risks associated with their operations but also to actively contribute to a healthier and more prosperous future. This is not merely a matter of corporate social responsibility; it is a strategic imperative.

By Princess Yaa Benson

The post The need to integrate medical insight into Ghana’s corporate environment appeared first on Ghana Business News.

Today marks a significant milestone in Ghana’s history – the 59th anniversary of the overthrow of our country’s first President, Osagyefo Dr. Kwame Nkrumah. As we reflect on this pivotal moment, it is critical that we observe the remarkable vision and contributions of this iconic leader, while also considering the profound impact his overthrow has had on the trajectory of our nation.

Dr. Kwame Nkrumah’s rise to power in 1952 when he became leader of government business, and later prime minister in 1957, was a watershed moment not only for Ghana, but for the entire African continent. As the first Prime Minister and subsequently the first President of an independent Ghana, Nkrumah’s leadership was characterized by a relentless pursuit of economic self-sufficiency and industrial development. Driven by his belief that true political freedom could only be achieved through economic independence, Nkrumah’s government embarked on an ambitious programme of industrialization, establishing a wide range of factories and enterprises.

This included the Volta Aluminum Company (VALCO), a state-of-the-art aluminum smelter plant, as well as the Tema Shipyard and Drydock, a facility dedicated to shipbuilding and repair. The government also prioritized the development of Ghana’s textile industry, with the establishment of factories such as the Ghana Textile Manufacturing Company and Akosombo Textiles Limited. Food processing and consumer goods manufacturing were not overlooked, as evidenced by the creation of entities like the Ghana Distilleries Limited, the Ghana Cement Factory (GHACEM), and the Ghana Food Distribution Corporation.

Alongside these industrial ventures, Nkrumah’s administration invested heavily in landmark infrastructure projects, such as the construction of the iconic Akosombo Dam, which provided the essential hydroelectric power to fuel industrial growth. The government also placed a strong emphasis on education, healthcare, and the creation of state-owned enterprises, all with the aim of empowering Ghanaians and building a self-reliant nation.

Unfortunately, Nkrumah’s visionary policies faced significant opposition, both domestically and internationally. On that fateful day, February 24, 1966, his government was overthrown in a coup d’état orchestrated by a coalition of military officers and political opponents. This pivotal moment marked a turning point in Ghana’s history, ushering in a period of political instability and economic challenges that would resonate for decades to come.

In the aftermath of Nkrumah’s overthrow, successive governments failed to uphold his vision for a self-sufficient, industrialized Ghana. The factories and enterprises established during his tenure, such as the Ghana Airways, the Ghana Film Industry Corporation, the Ghana Rubber Estates Limited, the Ghana National Trading Corporation (GNTC), the Ghana Sugar Factory, and the Ghana Timber Marketing Board, were either neglected, mismanaged, or privatized, leading to their eventual decline. Today, Ghana finds itself in a position where we import a wide range of products, including basic necessities, a stark contrast to Nkrumah’s dream of a nation that could meet the needs of its own people.

The impact of this neglect is felt across our economy. The decline of the once-thriving manufacturing sector, which had been bolstered by the Electron Company Limited, the Aboso Glass Factory, and the Ghana Refractory Company, has led to a rise in unemployment and a reliance on the informal sector. Our agricultural sector, which could have flourished alongside a robust industrial base, now struggles to compete with cheaper imported goods, undermining the livelihoods of local farmers and producers.

As we reflect on this significant anniversary, we cannot help but wonder what Ghana could have achieved had Nkrumah’s visionary policies been allowed to take root and flourish. While his legacy may be marred by the circumstances of his overthrow, Nkrumah’s commitment to Pan-Africanism and self-determination continues to inspire leaders across the continent.

To truly honour Nkrumah’s memory and reclaim his vision, Ghana must re-evaluate its economic policies and prioritize strategic investments in local industries. By reducing our dependency on imports and fostering a thriving manufacturing sector, we can build economic resilience and create sustainable employment opportunities for our citizens.

This call to action extends beyond the government; it is a responsibility that falls upon all Ghanaians to engage in robust civic discourse, hold our leaders accountable, and advocate for policies that promote local production, entrepreneurship, and the growth of small and medium-sized enterprises. Only through a collective effort can we revitalize the industries that Nkrumah once championed and unlock the true potential of our nation.

As we commemorate this significant anniversary, let us be reminded of the profound impact that visionary leadership can have on a country’s trajectory. While the overthrow of Osagyefo Dr. Kwame Nkrumah may have altered the course of Ghana’s history, his legacy and the unfulfilled potential of his vision remain a testament to the transformative power of bold, principled leadership.

By reclaiming Nkrumah’s dream and building upon the foundations he laid, we can honor his memory and work towards a future where Ghana stands tall, empowered by its industries, rich in resources, and self-sufficient in meeting the needs of its people. It is a future that Osagyefo Dr. Kwame Nkrumah envisioned, and it is one that we, as Ghanaians, must strive to realize.

However, to truly achieve this vision, we must also confront one of the underlying challenges that has plagued our nation for decades – the lack of a strong maintenance culture. Too often, we have failed to properly maintain the infrastructure, factories, and enterprises that were established during Nkrumah’s time, leading to their eventual decline. By cultivating a deep-rooted commitment to maintaining our assets and investments, we can ensure that the fruits of our labor endure and continue to benefit generations to come.

As we reflect on the 59th anniversary of Nkrumah’s overthrow, let this be a call to action for all Ghanaians. Let us unite in our resolve to reclaim the legacy of this visionary leader, revitalize our industries, and build a self-reliant, prosperous nation that fulfills the promise of Nkrumah’s dream. Only then can we truly honour the memory of Osagyefo Dr. Kwame Nkrumah and forge a future that does justice to his remarkable vision for Ghana.

By Innocent Samuel Appiah

The post Remembering Kwame Nkrumah: A visionary leader and the unfulfilled hopes of his overthrow appeared first on Ghana Business News.

It is becoming clear that at the time the country was grappling with a crippling economic crisis, and had to turn to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for a bailout, a staggering amount of the country’s wealth was looted, painting a picture of what could have saved us as a people, was diverted into individual pockets. This is what has seriously affected our journey towards a sustainable national development.

But for the Operation Recover All Loots (ORAL) team, which was put in place even before President John Dramani Mahama was sworn in, we would not have known the scale of the rape of the nation by those who only wanted to create havoc on the country.

Already, the final report presented to the President, by the ORAL team has uncovered over $20 billion in looted funds – a figure so astronomical that it boggles the mind. This begs the question: what transformative impact could these ill-gotten gains have had on Ghana’s development if they had been rightfully reclaimed and reinvested?

One of the most glaring challenges hampering Ghana’s progress has been the chronic underinvestment in critical infrastructure. From the dilapidated state of roads and bridges to the unreliable power supply and limited access to clean water, the country’s aging infrastructure has struggled to keep pace with the growing demands of its population.

The ORAL team’s report has uncovered a startling revelation about the state of  government-owned properties, exposing the staggering scale of loot, waste, and neglect. Their report also revealed that they have successfully prevented the demolition of over 50 government bungalows, including those belonging to the National Development Authority.

These bungalows, meant to provide affordable housing for civil servants and government officials, had become dilapidated due to years of chronic underfunding and lack of maintenance. Rather than investing in their upkeep and restoration, the outgone government had reportedly green-lighted their demolition to make way for private development projects.

Chairman of the ORAL team, Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, said the systematic neglect and demolition of government properties is not only a waste of public resources but also a betrayal of the trust placed in those who are meant to safeguard these assets for the people, and that the recovered funds could have been a lifeline to preserve these buildings and ensure that they continue to serve the public good.

These bungalows were just part of a broader trend of the previous government prioritizing private development over the preservation of its own assets. Across the country, scores of government-owned properties, including administrative offices, staff quarters, and even educational facilities, had been earmarked for demolition to make way for commercial ventures.

Ablakwa said if 36 cases they reviewed in detail are successfully pursued, the country could  recover about  $20.49 billion. These include cases such as the National Cathedral, PDS, SML, and GNPC Saltpond decommissioning. He also said cases involving state lands could also lead to significant financial recovery. “We have also estimated the value of state lands captured by individuals. If these individuals are made to pay the conservative market value for the lands they have taken, we could recover approximately $702.8 million for the Ghanaian people, ” Ablakwa added.

The ORAL team’s revelations have ignited a renewed sense of outrage and determination among the Ghanaian people, who are demanding that those responsible for the looting be held accountable and that the recovered funds be utilized for the betterment of the nation.

President Mahama has already taken the crucial step of presenting the report to the Attorney-General and Minister for Justice, signaling a commitment to pursuing prosecution and the retrieval of the looted funds.

The ORAL team’s findings have shed light on the broader issue of mismanagement and lack of accountability within  government circle. The fact that significant sums of money were allegedly looted from state coffers, even as critical government infrastructure fell into disrepair, underscores the urgent need for complete reforms to enhance transparency and fiscal responsibility.

Hopefully, government will invest in the restoration and maintenance of government-owned properties, so that the authorities can not only provide affordable housing and office space but also set an example of responsible asset management for the public sector.

These funds could help fund modern, reliable power grids supplying uninterrupted electricity to homes and businesses, spurring industrial growth and improving the quality of life for millions. It could also help provide  water treatment plants and distribution systems ensuring access to clean, safe drinking water for all Ghanaians – a basic human right that has eluded far too many.

These infrastructure upgrades would not only have improved the lives of Ghanaians but also laid the foundation for sustainable economic growth. Efficient transportation links, stable electricity, and reliable water supplies are the building blocks of a thriving economy, attracting investment, creating jobs, and driving productivity.

The recovered funds could have been channeled into bolstering Ghana’s human capital by enhancing healthcare facilities and improving access to quality education. This would have empowered Ghanaians to contribute more effectively to the nation’s development, breaking the shackles of generational poverty.

As the country navigates through  this challenging period, the recovery of the looted funds must remain a top priority. The successful repatriation and prudent allocation of these resources could serve as a springboard to transform the country into a beacon of progress, setting an example for other African nations grappling with the scourge of corruption.

It is not going to be easy to navigate the complex legal and diplomatic channels necessary to retrieve the stolen assets. This  will require unwavering political will, a steadfast commitment to the rule of law, and international cooperation. Equally crucial will be the transparent and accountable management of the recovered funds, ensuring that they are channeled into projects that truly benefit the  people.

President Mahama deserves commendation for assembling a highly diligent and capable ORAL team that managed to uncover such an astounding level of looted funds in a remarkably short period of time. The team’s relentless efforts, combined with the brave individuals who came forward with critical information, have exposed the true depths of the corruption that has plagued Ghana for far too long.

With this report in hand, the government now has a crucial opportunity to reclaim these stolen assets and channel them towards the country’s long-overdue development. The Ghanaian people eagerly await the government’s decisive actions to hold the culprits accountable and put the recovered funds to work for the betterment of the nation.

By Innocent Samuel Appiah

The post Ghana’s development woes appeared first on Ghana Business News.

As a people, we really know how to destroy everything that we should cherish. Otherwise, how could we allow the Kwame Nkrumah Interchange, which should have been a national monument of pride, to become a den for social misfits from all parts of the world.

When the interchange was completed, it was meant to be a symbol of modern urban development in Accra. Unfortunately, like everything that we have not taken good care of, it has become an alarming illustration of the capital’s growing social crisis, with foreign nationals, homeless individuals, and various groups turning the facility into an informal settlement, and which can be described as a “slum.”

The $74 million interchange, inaugurated in 2016, and was described as “Circle Dubai,” now presents a stark contrast between its architectural grandeur and the humanitarian crisis unfolding beneath its spans. Recent assessments reveal an unprecedented occupation of the facility’s pavements and underground spaces by homeless individuals, including a significant number of foreign nationals with young children.

“What we’re witnessing is deeply troubling,” says Social Welfare Officer Martha Dodoo. “We have seen children as young as one or two years being used to solicit alms from commuters. These children are being exposed to harsh weather conditions and various forms of danger.”

The situation has evolved beyond a simple case of homelessness into a complex web of social issues. Reports indicate that some occupants have begun dismantling the interchange’s infrastructure, removing pavement bricks to construct makeshift shelters. The underground sections, designed as pedestrian walkways, have become notorious for drug use and other illicit activities.

Security expert Kofi Mensah notes, “The interchange has essentially become a parallel community operating outside the formal structures of society. The presence of organized groups engaging in various forms of illegal activities poses serious security concerns for commuters and nearby businesses.”

The phenomenon of foreign nationals such as Malians, dominating these spaces has added another layer of complexity to the situation. Many arrive with young children and engage in aggressive begging, sometimes resulting in confrontations with pedestrians who decline to give alms.

“The hostility faced by commuters who refuse to give money is particularly concerning,” says Market trader Abena Owusu, who uses the interchange daily. “Some of these individuals become verbally abusive, making it uncomfortable and sometimes frightening to use the facility.”

The deteriorating conditions prompted Child Rights International to file a lawsuit seeking to address the issue of streetism and child exploitation. However, the court’s dismissal of the case has left advocates frustrated and searching for alternative solutions.

“The court’s decision was disappointing,” says Child Rights International Executive Director Bright Appiah. “We believe there’s a fundamental need to protect these children from exploitation while addressing the broader social issues that lead to such situations.”

Local authorities face multiple challenges in addressing the situation. The presence of foreign nationals requires diplomatic considerations, while the humanitarian aspects demand careful handling to avoid rights violations.

The Department of Social Welfare acknowledges the complexity of the situation. “We’re dealing with multiple vulnerable groups – homeless individuals, children, migrants – each requiring different interventions,” explains Department spokesperson Joyce Amankwah. “Simply removing people without addressing the underlying issues would be neither effective nor humane.”

The deterioration of the interchange’s infrastructure is another pressing concern. Engineers estimate significant damage to the facility’s auxiliary structures, particularly the pedestrian walkways and drainage systems. The removal of pavement bricks not only poses safety risks but also accelerates the deterioration of the facility.

Urban planning expert Dr. Kwesi Amponsah suggests that the situation reflects broader urban management challenges. “This is symptomatic of our failure to anticipate and plan for social impacts when developing major infrastructure. We need integrated approaches that consider both physical infrastructure and social services,” Amponsah added.

Meanwhile, local businesses report declining customer numbers due to safety concerns. “People are afraid to visit our shops, especially in the evening,” says business owner James Quartey. “The situation is affecting our livelihoods,” he said.

Attempts by law enforcement to address the situation have yielded limited results, with cleared areas being reoccupied within days. The police cite the need for a coordinated approach involving multiple agencies and stakeholders.

As the situation continues to deteriorate, calls are growing for a comprehensive intervention that addresses both the humanitarian aspects and infrastructure preservation. Suggestions include establishing designated shelters, implementing coordinated social services, and enhancing security measures.

However, without clear jurisdiction and coordinated action between various government agencies, the Kwame Nkrumah Interchange remains a vivid illustration of Accra’s growing urban challenges, where infrastructure development and social crisis intersect in plain view of the public.

The situation demands urgent attention not just for the preservation of a key infrastructure asset, but more importantly, for the protection of vulnerable individuals, especially children, who find themselves caught in this complex social crisis.

By Innocent Samuel Appiah

The post The sad state of the Kwame Nkrumah interchange appeared first on Ghana Business News.

The recent scandal surrounding Ms. Gloria Nkrumah, an employee of the Social Security and National Insurance Trust (SSNIT), has unveiled shocking irregularities within one of Ghana’s key public institutions. Documents obtained through the Right to Information Act reveal that Ms. Nkrumah reported to work for only 203 days over a four-year period, raising questions about favouritism, abuse of power, and systemic failures in governance.

According to SSNIT’s electronic attendance records, Ms. Nkrumah’s attendance has been dismal: just 53 days in 2021, 102 days in 2022, a mere four days in 2023, and 44 days in 2024 up to October. Such numbers not only reflect a staggering absenteeism rate but also point to possible collusion within the organization that enabled her to remain on the payroll without facing consequences.

Sources allege that Ms. Nkrumah’s continued employment has been facilitated by her close associations with senior officials, particularly the recently ousted Deputy Director-General, Michael Addo, and General Manager of Administration, Jonathan Akyeampong. These connections have purportedly shielded her from scrutiny and disciplinary action, despite her blatant disregard for workplace norms.

A senior SSNIT official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, expressed deep concern about the implications of such favouritism. “When an employee can effectively abandon their responsibilities without repercussions, it sends a damaging message about accountability and fairness,” the official stated. This sentiment echoes the broader fears of many within SSNIT, who worry that the integrity of the institution is being compromised.

In light of these findings, SSNIT has initiated investigative committees to delve into workplace conduct and the medical claims associated with Ms. Nkrumah. Although the findings of the medical board remain confidential, the Trust has confirmed that no foreign medical bills were paid on her behalf, countering earlier rumours that she had exploited medical provisions during her prolonged absence.

On June 6, 2024, in a significant policy shift, SSNIT suspended Ms. Nkrumah’s salary payments. Management has directed the General Manager of Administration/HR to issue a formal query regarding her failure to return to duty by July 31, 2024, providing her with 48 hours to respond. This action aligns with the protocols outlined in SSNIT’s HR Manual 2011 concerning the vacation of post, yet many wonder why it took so long for decisive action to be taken.

Labour relations expert Dr. Augustus Kwame Mensah has described this case as “unprecedented in Ghana’s public sector.” He emphasized the need for strong internal controls, stating, “An employee being absent for approximately 85% of their required working time raises serious questions about the oversight mechanisms in place.”

The scandal has raised attention from various civil society organizations advocating for public sector reforms. Philomena Owusu-Agyapong, a good governance expert, has called for a comprehensive investigation into similar cases across public institutions. “This isn’t merely about one employee; it highlights systemic issues that allow such abuses to persist. We must examine how widespread this problem is,” she asserted.

Further complicating matters, investigations suggest that Ms. Nkrumah has misused SSNIT’s medical provisions. After taking paid annual leave in the USA for 2022, she refused to return, citing medical excuses for 2023. Alarmingly, she continued to receive her full salary and allowances, including fuel stipends, while residing in the USA, blatantly violating SSNIT rules, the Public Services Manual, and relevant Ghanaian laws.

The disparity in treatment between Ms. Nkrumah and other employees raises serious concerns about bias and favouritism within the organization. For instance, another employee from the Hohoe branch was dismissed for a minor infraction involving just GH¢280.00. Such incongruities underscore the need for a transparent and equitable enforcement of workplace policies.

A memo dated April 15, 2024, from SSNIT’s General Counsel to the General Manager of Administration and HR, explicitly stated that all unlawful salary payments made to Ms. Nkrumah in 2023 must be returned to the Trust. This memo reflects a growing recognition of the need for accountability and highlights the urgency of addressing such discrepancies within public service.

As SSNIT navigates its disciplinary actions, critical questions remain regarding how such a blatant abuse of power was allowed to continue unchecked for so long. Stakeholders are calling for robust oversight mechanisms and stringent measures to prevent similar infractions in the future. The case serves as a stark reminder of the importance of accountability in public institutions and the need for transparent processes that uphold the principles of good governance.

Authorities must take this scandal seriously, as it has the potential to erode public trust in the institution and the broader public sector. The parliamentary Select Committee on Employment has expressed interest in the case, advocating for a comprehensive audit of attendance and payroll systems across state institutions. “This case could be just the tip of the iceberg; we need to ensure public funds are not misused to pay for ghost workers or perpetually absent employees,” stated a committee member.

As the scandal unfolds, the implications are clear: the status quo cannot continue. The SSNIT management claims to be following due process, but stakeholders are demanding more than just lip service. The public deserves transparency, accountability, and a commitment to reform that addresses the root causes of these systemic failures.

In conclusion, the case of Gloria Nkrumah is not merely an individual scandal; it is a call to action for the authorities to sit up and take notice. The time for reform is now, as the integrity of Ghana’s public service hangs in the balance. It is imperative that the relevant authorities act decisively to restore public confidence and ensure that such abuses are eradicated from the system. Only then can the trust in public institutions be rebuilt, safeguarding the interests of all Ghanaians.

By Innocent Samuel Appiah

The post SSNIT absenteeism scandal: Gloria Nkrumah’s case exposes systemic failures appeared first on Ghana Business News.

In a dramatic turn of events, the Ghanaian Parliament has found itself embroiled in controversy following a chaotic vetting session that culminated in the destruction of state property. The incident has sparked widespread outrage, leading to calls for accountability among members of Parliament (MPs) and a serious reevaluation of the standards expected from elected officials.

The uproar began during a session intended to vet ministerial nominees, a crucial process in ensuring competent leadership within the government. However, what unfolded was a scene of disorder as MPs engaged in a physical altercation that escalated into a free-for-all. Reports indicate that furniture was damaged, microphones were destroyed, and the overall decorum of the parliamentary process was egregiously undermined. This behavior has drawn condemnation from citizens and political observers alike, who are appalled that those elected to serve can act in such a manner.

Many are calling for the immediate resignation of the MPs involved, arguing that their actions are unbecoming of individuals who hold the title of “Honorable.” One speaker expressed his expectation that the police should take action against those responsible for the destruction, stating, “Anyone responsible for the destruction of furniture and equipment must be surcharged with the cost.” This sentiment reflects a broader demand for transparency and accountability within the parliamentary system, as citizens increasingly feel that their representatives should be held to the same standards as ordinary citizens.

Criticism has particularly focused on the leadership of the Appointments Committee, with Chairman Bernard Ahiafor facing backlash for his failure to maintain order during the proceedings. Observers argue that his inability to effectively manage the session reflects a broader failure of leadership within Parliament. Calls for his resignation have intensified, with many questioning how he can preside over the entire House of 276 members if he cannot handle a smaller committee effectively.

The incident has also raised concerns about the dynamics within Parliament, especially with regard to the influence of certain MPs over proceedings. Alexander Afenyo-Markin, a member of the NPP and Minority Leader, has been accused of using his position to dominate discussions. His comments just a day prior to the incident, indicating that the majority had yet to see his “worst side,” have been interpreted as a precursor to the chaos that ensued. Critics argue that such statements contribute to an atmosphere of hostility and disruptiveness in Parliament.

As discussions continue about the implications of this incident, it becomes clear that the behavior displayed by MPs is not just an isolated event; it reflects a broader trend of declining civility and respect within the political sphere. Many individuals are questioning the quality of leadership present in Parliament, stating that it seems bereft of principles of collaboration and consensus-building. “This is not the first time we’ve seen such behavior. It seems to be becoming a pattern,” remarked one concerned citizen.

The public’s frustration is palpable, as many Ghanaians are left wondering how their elected officials can engage in such behavior without facing consequences. The expectation is that MPs should conduct themselves with the utmost respect for the offices they hold and the citizens they serve. The notion that they can engage in such behavior without repercussions has left many feeling disillusioned and frustrated.

In the aftermath of the chaos, there have been calls for more robust mechanisms for conflict resolution within Parliament. Observers suggest that mediation services could be introduced to help resolve disputes before they escalate into public altercations. Additionally, MPs could benefit from training on effective communication and conflict management strategies. This could foster a more respectful and productive environment, where disagreements can be aired without resorting to violence or destruction.

Furthermore, the incident serves as a wake-up call for Parliament to address its internal dynamics and the culture that permits such behavior. There is a pressing need for MPs to recognize the impact of their actions on public perception and to understand that they are representatives of the people. They must work to restore faith in the institution by demonstrating accountability, respect, and a commitment to their duties.

As discussions continue, it is crucial for Parliament to take decisive steps to restore trust among the citizenry. This includes holding those responsible for the chaos accountable, enhancing the training and support provided to MPs, and establishing clearer guidelines for conduct within the House. Only through these measures can Parliament begin to rebuild its reputation and reaffirm its commitment to serving the people of Ghana.

In conclusion, the recent chaos in Parliament not only highlights the urgent need for reform and accountability among elected officials but also serves as a critical juncture for the future of Ghanaian democracy. As citizens demand better leadership, it is essential for Parliament to rise above the fray and reaffirm its commitment to integrity and honor. The expectation is clear: MPs must be held accountable for their actions, and the integrity of the parliamentary process must be restored. Only then can Ghana continue to progress towards a more effective and trustworthy democracy.

By Innocent Samuel Appiah

The post A call for accountability after disorderly conduct in Ghana Parliament appeared first on Ghana Business News.

Should the former Ghana Investment Promotion Centre (GIPC) chief executive officer, Mr. Reginald Yoofi Grant, be required to refund or face trial for all the monies he received while in office after he was due to retire on March 10, 2024?

By that time, he had already long passed the mandatory retirement age of 65 years.

A damning exposé lifted the lid on the irregular and seemingly unlawful extension of Mr. Grant’s employment contract, which has drawn widespread condemnation from legal experts, civil society, and the general public.

New government revokes Grants appointment

Meanwhile, the new John Mahama administration which took office early 2025 yesterday January 27, revoked Grants appointment. Sources indicate that Mr Grant has not been reporting to work since the results of the December 2024 elections were announced.

A flagrant breach of the Constitution

The detailed investigation showed that Mr. Grant, who was born on March 10, 1959, attained the mandatory retirement age of 60 years on March 10, 2019. However, his employment contract was extended by the former President for an additional year, allowing him to continue in his role until 2020.

The problems escalated when Mr. Grant crossed the constitutional age limit of 65 years on March 10, 2024. Article 199 of the 1992 Constitution is unequivocal on the retirement age and pensions of public officers, stating that “A public officer shall, except as otherwise provided in this constitution, retire from the public service on attaining the age of sixty years.” The Constitution does provide for limited extensions, but these are strictly capped at a maximum of two years at a time, not exceeding five years in total. Yet, in a blatant disregard for the law, Mr. Grant claimed that his contract was extended even further, allowing him to continue in his role until the end of the year 2024, but failed to show the said contract letter to management or the board of directors.

According to Michael Youri, a lawyer, “This is a clear violation of the Constitution, which sets clear parameters for the retirement and engagement of public officers. The fact that Mr. Grant was allowed to continue in his position despite exceeding the mandatory retirement age is a troubling breach of the law that must be addressed with urgency.”

“The trust that the Ghanaian public has placed in GIPC has been betrayed by this blatant disregard for the law. The monies that Mr. Grant has unlawfully received must be returned to the institution, as these funds belong to the hard-working citizens of Ghana,” he added.

Accountability and restitution

“If Mr. Grant has been drawing salary and enjoying the benefits of his position at GIPC for nearly a year after he should have rightfully retired, then it is a clear case of abuse of office and a misappropriation of public funds, and he must be made to refund every pesewa he has received since March 2024. The continued employment of Mr. Grant beyond the constitutional age limit has not only undermined the principles of good governance but has also potentially deprived younger and equally capable Ghanaians of the opportunity to serve in leadership roles within GIPC,” said Orstin Abednego Rawlings, President of United States African Command (AFRICOM).

The call for Grant to refund his unlawful earnings is seen as a necessary first step in restoring the integrity of the GIPC and reassuring the Ghanaian public that the principles of good governance will be upheld without fear or favor.

A stain on GIPC’s reputation

The latest revelations have dealt a further blow to GIPC’s already tarnished reputation. The institution is currently saddled with a staggering debt of over GH¢50 million, while worker’s social security contributions have remained unpaid for an extended period. This precarious financial situation, coupled with the blatant disregard for the retirement age and contract extension rules, has severely eroded public trust in the GIPC.

“GIPC is a critical institution that serves as the custodian of the hard-earned contributions of Ghanaian workers. The continuous mismanagement and disregard for the rule of law have eroded public trust in the institution and put the financial security of millions of Ghanaians at risk,” said Shallovern Srodah, National Chairman of the Council of Indigenous Business Association (CIBA).

A call for sweeping reforms

As the dust settles on this latest scandal, the spotlight has once again turned to the urgent need for sweeping reforms within GIPC and other public institutions in Ghana. Governance experts and civil society organizations have called for the implementation of robust oversight mechanisms, strengthened accountability measures, and a renewed commitment to transparency to prevent such egregious abuses of power from occurring in the future.

“The people of Ghana deserve a GIPC that is truly accountable to them, one that prioritizes the interests of workers over the personal agendas of its leadership,” stated Mr. Srodah. “This latest incident is a clarion call for fundamental changes in the way our public institutions are managed and governed.”

With the call for the former GIPC boss to refund his unlawful earnings, the stage is set for a new era of accountability and transparency at the Centre. However, the true test will be in the implementation of comprehensive reforms that ensure such blatant disregard for the law never happens again.

The Ghanaian public, whose hard-earned investments and contributions have been entrusted to GIPC, will be watching closely, demanding nothing less than a complete overhaul of the institution’s governance structures and a steadfast commitment to upholding the principles of good governance that are the hallmark of a thriving democracy. The people of Ghana deserve a GIPC that is truly accountable to them, one that prioritizes the interests of investors and the broader public over the personal agendas of its leadership. This latest incident is a clarion call for fundamental changes in the way our public institutions, especially those responsible for managing the nation’s economic assets, are governed. Only through sweeping reforms that restore transparency, strengthen accountability, and align GIPC’s operations with the highest standards of integrity can the trust of the Ghanaian people be fully regained. Ghanaians have their contributions with GIPC, and it is imperative that these contributions are managed with utmost responsibility and integrity.

By Innocent Samuel Appiah

The post Should Yoofi Grant pay for his sins at GIPC? appeared first on Ghana Business News.

The catastrophic shooting incident that claimed the lives of at least eight people has once again highlighted the need for urgent action to address the underlying issues fueling conflicts between mining companies and local communities in Ghana.

The skirmish, which occurred near the premises of the Anglogold Ashanti mine in Obuasi, has left the nation in a state of shock and sorrow. Eyewitness accounts and reports from community members paint a troubling picture of the events that unfolded, raising concerns about the use of excessive force and the failure to de-escalate the situation effectively.

In response to the unfortunate incident, President John Dramani Mahama has ordered an immediate investigation to determine the circumstances surrounding the clashes and ensure that any individuals found to have acted unlawfully are brought to justice.

“It’s distressing to see lives lost over a conflict that could have been resolved through dialogue and mutual understanding. These are our people, our neighbors, and they deserve to have their grievances heard and addressed in a peaceful manner,” said Isaac Kofi Mensah, a local community leader.

The incident has reignited longstanding debates about the complex relationship between mining companies, the government, and the communities that host these lucrative operations. For years, residents of resource-rich areas have voiced their frustrations over the perceived lack of equitable distribution of the wealth generated from the extraction of their natural resources.

A Political Economist, Professor Ignatius Ofori-Frimpong explained that “The people here know that there is gold beneath their homes, yet they feel that they are not reaping the benefits. This sense of disenfranchisement and the perception of being left behind fuels the tensions that ultimately boil over into these tragic confrontations.”

The need for comprehensive reforms

In the wake of the Obuasi tragedy, there are growing calls for the government and mining companies to engage in a complete review of the existing frameworks governing the extractive industry. Experts and community advocates argue that a more holistic approach is necessary to address the underlying economic and social factors that contribute to these conflicts.

According to Maame Yaa Mensah, a human rights activist, “It’s not enough to simply investigate the immediate incident and apportion blame. We need to take a hard look at the entire system – the legal and regulatory environment, the revenue-sharing mechanisms, the corporate social responsibility practices, and the overall engagement with local communities.”

One of the key areas of focus should be the equitable distribution of the wealth generated from mining activities. Calls are mounting for a significant increase in the percentage of profits that are reinvested into the development of host communities, ensuring that the people who bear the brunt of the environmental and social impacts also reap tangible benefits.

“The current revenue-sharing model is simply not working. We need to empower these communities, provide them with sustainable economic opportunities, and ensure that they have a genuine stake in the success of the mining operations,” said Mensah.

Strengthening community engagement and dispute resolution

Together with the need for reforms in the revenue-sharing framework, there is also a pressing demand for more effective mechanisms to address disputes and grievances between mining companies and local communities.

Professor Ofori-Frimpong opined, “The current approach to conflict resolution is often reactive and confrontational. We need to invest in building trust, facilitating open dialogue, and establishing structured dispute resolution processes that involve the community stakeholders as equal partners.”

This could include the creation of dedicated community liaison offices within mining companies, the training of company personnel in conflict mediation and negotiation skills, and the establishment of independent grievance mechanisms that are accessible and trusted by the local populations.

“The goal should be to foster a culture of collaboration and mutual understanding, where the interests of the mining companies, the government, and the communities are aligned and respected,” said Maame Yaa Mensah.

Empowering local institutions and strengthening governance

Underlying the challenges in the mining sector is the broader issue of governance and the role of local institutions in managing natural resource wealth. Experts argue that strengthening the capacity and autonomy of traditional authorities, local government bodies, and community-based organizations is crucial for addressing the root causes of these conflicts.

“We need to empower the traditional leadership structures and give them a more prominent role in the decision-making processes around mining activities. They are the custodians of the land and have a deep understanding of the aspirations and concerns of their communities,” said Professor Ofori-Frimpong.

Also, calls are being made for increased transparency and accountability in the management of mining revenues, with demands for more robust public reporting and auditing mechanisms to ensure that the funds are being utilized effectively for community development.

“Good governance is the foundation upon which we can build sustainable and equitable solutions,” said Maame Yaa Mensah. “Without it, we will continue to see these tragic incidents, and the cycle of conflict will persist.”

Moving forward with empathy and determination

As the nation grapples with the aftermath of the Obuasi tragedy, there is a growing recognition that the time for incremental changes has passed. Decisive action and a transformative approach are needed to address the long-standing issues that have fueled these conflicts and eroded the trust between mining companies, the government, and local communities.

“We owe it to the victims and their families to ensure that their deaths were not in vain. We must come together, put aside our differences, and work towards a future where the wealth of our natural resources truly benefits all Ghanaians, not just a select few,” said the human rights activist.

The path forward will undoubtedly be challenging, but with empathy, determination, and a firm commitment to inclusive and sustainable development, the nation can chart a new course that prioritizes the well-being of its people and the integrity of its natural resources.

By Innocent Samuel Appiah

The post Obuasi tragedy calls for mining conflict resolution and community empowerment appeared first on Ghana Business News.